CPI Came in Cool, the Market Shrugged, and the Week Still Lost 1.5% – Market Breakdown #178
Inflation fell to 2.4%, the best read since May 2025, and the S&P moved three points. Applied Materials surged 14%, Rivian jumped 27%, DraftKings crashed 14%, software bounced, gold hit $5,000.
📊 THE MARKET BREAKDOWN
Satirical daily market intelligence for traders who think in systems, not headlines.
Issue #178 | February 13, 2026
🔥 Headlines & Hysteria (powered by Forked Feed)
CPI Comes in Below Expectations at 2.4% and the Market Responds With a Resounding “Meh”
Forked Feed says: January CPI printed at 0.2% monthly and 2.4% annually, both below consensus estimates of 0.3% and 2.5%. Core came in at 0.3% monthly and 2.5% yearly, exactly where it was supposed to. Shelter costs rose just 0.2%, bringing the annual increase down to 3%, the lowest since the pandemic inflation spiral began. Energy fell 1.5%. Egg prices dropped 7%. Used cars fell 1.8%. This is the kind of inflation report that six months ago would have launched the S&P through the roof. Instead, the broad market index gained 0.05%. Three points. The Dow added 49 points. The Nasdaq actually fell 0.22%. The market got the exact data it wanted, the data that keeps rate cuts on the table, the data that says tariff-driven inflation is largely behind us, and it responded like a teenager being told dinner’s ready. Technically it acknowledged the information. Emotionally, it could not have cared less. Why? Because the market just spent the last 48 hours watching a karaoke company crash the trucking sector and AI panic wipe $200 billion off Apple, and a single inflation print isn’t enough therapy to process that kind of trauma. Tom Lee called it “normal inflation conditions” and said the Fed has “a lot of room to cut.” The market said “that’s nice” and went into a three-day weekend. Economists noted the data may have a downward bias because of the government shutdown data gaps last fall. So even the good news comes with an asterisk. The Fed is still expected to cut in June. CME FedWatch shows a 94% probability of a 25-basis-point cut. But nobody is celebrating because the last three weeks proved that rate cuts don’t matter when the market is busy playing “guess which sector AI kills next.”
Forked Feed says: Applied Materials reported Q1 EPS of $2.38 versus $2.19 expected and revenue of $7.01 billion versus $6.88 billion expected. Then it guided Q2 revenue to $7.65 billion, which is so far above the $7.01 billion consensus that analysts had to check if they were reading the right line item. The stock surged 14%, adding tens of billions in market cap in a single session. CEO Gary Dickerson called it the “Giga-cycle,” a term that sounds like something a spin class instructor would say but apparently describes the structural decoupling of chip equipment demand from the old smartphone-and-PC replacement cycles. The thesis: AI computing requires “unprecedented spending” on manufacturing capacity, and Applied Materials makes the machines that make the chips that make the machines that will allegedly replace all of our jobs. Semi systems revenue is expected to grow more than 20% year-over-year. Citi raised its price target from $250 to $400. Wells Fargo was “impressed.” Everyone was impressed. The only people who weren’t impressed were the employees of C.H. Robinson, who are still processing that a karaoke company erased 15% of their market cap yesterday while Applied Materials added 14% because the same technology is supposedly going to destroy trucking and also make chip equipment companies extremely rich. This is the 2026 market distilled into two sentences: if you build the machines that power AI, you’re up 14%. If your job could theoretically be done by AI, you’re down 15%. There is no third option.
Rivian Surges 27% Because Apparently Electric Trucks Are the New AI Hedge
Forked Feed says: Rivian reported Q4 adjusted losses of 54 cents per share versus the 68 cents expected, on revenue of $1.29 billion that beat the $1.26 billion estimate. But the real fireworks were in the 2026 guidance: deliveries of 62,000 to 67,000 units, representing 47% to 59% growth over 2025. Then it announced the long-awaited R2 midsized SUV begins deliveries in Q2. The stock exploded 27% in a single day. This is a company that is still losing money on every vehicle it makes and just had its best day in years because it said it would deliver more vehicles on which it loses money. But here’s the thing: Rivian also achieved its first full year of positive gross profit in 2025, which means the economics are actually improving. The per-unit losses are shrinking. The R2 is the cheaper mass-market play that investors have been waiting for. And in a market where every other stock is being evaluated through the lens of “will AI replace this,” Rivian has the advantage of existing in a sector where nobody is worried about robots building trucks because robots building trucks is actually the plan. It’s the one company where AI disruption is a feature, not a threat. That, plus a legitimately good earnings report, equals the best single-day performance in the EV space since Elon Musk last said something weird on Twitter. Which was probably also today.
Forked Feed says: DraftKings reported Q4 revenue of $1.99 billion, up 43% year-over-year. It posted net income of $136 million, its first quarterly GAAP profit. For the full year, revenue exceeded $6 billion, adjusted EBITDA more than tripled, and the company finally achieved the profitability milestone it had been promising since going public in 2019. The stock crashed 14% to $21.76, approaching its 52-week low. The crime? Guiding 2026 revenue to $6.5 to $6.9 billion against a $7.3 billion consensus, with EBITDA of $700 to $900 million versus the $998 million the Street wanted. The company is spending aggressively on “DraftKings Predictions,” its new prediction market platform, and deliberately excluded any potential revenue from that product while including all the costs. So the guidance looks conservative because it literally is conservative, by design, because the CEO decided to front-load expenses for a product that doesn’t have revenue yet. The market’s response was to sell the stock to its lowest level in years. DraftKings also has to deal with Illinois raising sports betting taxes to a 40% top bracket, a federal cap on gambling loss deductions, and the ongoing existential question of whether prediction markets are going to cannibalize sports betting. But sure, let’s focus on the fact that the company that just posted its first profit ever had the audacity to invest in its future. Penn Entertainment fell 5% in sympathy because apparently being in the same industry as a company that’s spending money is also a sellable offense.
Software Stocks Stage a Modest Bounce While Mega-Cap Tech Keeps Bleeding
Forked Feed says: After three weeks of the SaaSpocalypse, software stocks finally caught a breath on Friday. Salesforce rose 2.6%. Oracle gained 2.9%. ServiceNow jumped 3.7% after announcing an acquisition of Pyramid Analytics, because nothing says “I’m not being disrupted by AI” like buying an analytics company to prove you’re doing AI things. The IGV software ETF bounced. BTIG said the sector has hit “extreme oversold levels” and flagged Salesforce and ServiceNow as rebound candidates. Jensen Huang, who has a financial interest in software not dying, said the idea that AI is replacing the software industry is “wrong.” It was a nice day for the battered sector. But let’s provide some context. Salesforce is still down 26% from recent highs. ServiceNow is down more than 25% in six months and hit a 52-week low of $98.94 just last week after trading above $900 fourteen months ago. The IGV is 31% below its highs and in a technical bear market. Oracle is 50% off its September peak. So today’s 3-4% bounce is less “recovery” and more “the bleeding paused long enough to change the bandages.” Meanwhile, the mega-caps that were supposed to be immune from the AI disruption trade kept falling. Apple dropped another 2.3%, its second consecutive terrible session after the Siri delay and FTC scrutiny. Nvidia fell 2.2%. Meta lost 1.6%. Broadcom dropped 1.8%. The companies spending $700 billion combined on AI infrastructure are being sold because investors are now worried the infrastructure spending won’t generate returns. So to recap: software is down because AI will replace it. Hardware is down because maybe AI won’t generate returns. The only stocks allowed to go up are chip equipment makers, electric trucks, foam clogs, and McDonald’s.
🔎 Today’s Focus: Friday the 13th and the Three-Day Pause
The market got its tiebreaker. CPI came in cool. And it didn’t matter.
The S&P 500 closed at 6,836, up 3 points, which rounds to functionally zero. The Dow added 49 points to 49,501. The Nasdaq fell 0.22% to 22,547. For the week, the S&P lost 1.5%, the Nasdaq shed 2.1%, and the Dow gave back its entire run above 50,000, closing the week at 49,501 after touching that milestone just days ago. The VIX settled at 20.60, which is elevated but down from Thursday’s panic levels.
This was supposed to be the session that reset the narrative. The January CPI printed at 2.4% annually, the lowest since May 2025, with shelter costs decelerating to a 3% annual rate that matched a four-year low. Headline monthly inflation came in at 0.2%, below the 0.3% consensus. Economists celebrated. Rate cut expectations held. The CME FedWatch tool shows 94% odds of a June cut. Tom Lee said the Fed has “a lot of room to cut.” Everything that was supposed to happen, happened. And the market traded sideways into a three-day weekend.
The problem is that inflation is no longer the market’s primary concern. Three weeks of AI disruption selling have fundamentally shifted what investors are focused on. The SaaSpocalypse wiped a trillion dollars off software. Thursday’s trucking and real estate panic extended the contagion to sectors nobody saw coming. Apple lost $202 billion in a single session. The question the market is asking isn’t “will the Fed cut rates?” It’s “which of my stocks is about to be declared obsolete by a white paper?”
The session’s real stories happened beneath the surface. Applied Materials surged 14% on a blowout earnings report, confirming that AI infrastructure spending is accelerating, not slowing. Rivian jumped 27% on strong delivery guidance and the R2 launch timeline. Software stocks caught a small bounce. But the mega-caps kept sliding: Apple fell another 2.3%, Nvidia dropped 2.2%, and the Magnificent Seven collectively underperformed. Gold crossed $5,000 and settled at $5,042. The flight-to-safety trade that started Thursday continued Friday, just more quietly.
Markets are closed Monday for Presidents’ Day. Investors have 72 hours to decide whether the AI disruption narrative has peaked or is just getting started.
Forked Feed says: The market got the CPI print it needed and responded with the enthusiasm of a cat being shown a cucumber. Three points on the S&P. The index closed the week at 6,836, which is below where it started the year, below where it was when the Dow hit 50,000, and 2.4% below the 7,000 level that has rejected every rally attempt in 2026. The week’s scorecard: inflation is cooling, jobs are being created, the Fed is on track to cut, and the market lost 1.5% anyway because a karaoke company scared the trucking sector, Siri still can’t set a contextual reminder, and Cisco’s memory is too expensive because AI bought all the chips. The S&P has now spent the entire year trapped between 6,700 and 7,000, and the three-day weekend isn’t going to resolve that. Applied Materials proved the AI buildout is real. DraftKings proved that profitability doesn’t save you if your guidance disappoints. And Rivian proved that the only way to have a good day in 2026 is to make physical objects that require a factory, a supply chain, and actual human workers, which is ironic given that the entire AI thesis is that none of those things will be necessary in five years.
⚡ The Setup
SPY 681.75 | BTC 68,888 | US10Y 4.050 | DXY 96.88
SPY closed the week at 681.75, which puts the S&P 500 at 6,836 and firmly in no-man’s-land between the 6,780 support from the January 21 low and the 6,900 resistance that has capped every recent bounce. The cool CPI removed the immediate risk of a macro-driven selloff but didn’t generate enough buying pressure to repair the technical damage from Thursday’s 1.6% drop. Breadth improved slightly from Thursday’s washout but remained weak. The three-day weekend creates a positioning vacuum: institutional desks will have trimmed risk heading into Monday’s closure, and the first real test comes Tuesday when markets reopen to whatever macro or AI headlines accumulate over 72 hours. If SPY holds 680 on Tuesday’s open, the base case for a grind back toward 688-692 is intact. A break below 678 (S&P 6,780) reopens the correction scenario.
BTC recovered to $68,888 after Thursday’s slide toward $66,000 as the cool CPI print eased some pressure on risk assets. Bitcoin has now been range-bound between $65,000 and $72,000 for most of February, which is the kind of consolidation that either resolves with a breakout or a breakdown. The crypto market is watching equities for direction rather than leading, and the three-day weekend with crypto markets open but equity markets closed creates an asymmetric risk window. If nothing bad happens over the weekend, BTC likely holds. If a geopolitical headline drops while equity traders are at brunch, crypto takes the first hit.
The 10-year yield fell to 4.050%, continuing Thursday’s flight-to-safety bid and now reflecting the cooler CPI data. This is the lowest level since mid-January and a meaningful move from the 4.18% print after Wednesday’s jobs report. The bond market has decided that the inflation trajectory is benign enough to justify pricing in rate cuts, even as the equity market is too distracted by AI disruption fears to care. The divergence between falling yields and a flat stock market is unusual and suggests that fixed income is more optimistic about the macro outlook than equities are about corporate earnings. If yields stabilize around 4.00-4.10%, that should eventually support equity valuations, but “eventually” could be after more AI-panic sessions.
DXY settled at 96.88, continuing its slow grind lower in 2026. The dollar is weakening on rate cut expectations and cooling inflation, which in a normal market would be unambiguously bullish for equities and crypto. But this isn’t a normal market. The dollar is telling you the macro environment is improving while the stock market is telling you none of that matters because someone might publish a white paper about AI-powered dentistry and crash the healthcare sector. The next meaningful DXY level is 96.50 on the downside and 97.50 on the upside. Neither is likely to break over a three-day weekend with no U.S. economic data.
🧩 Market Archetype: The Exhaustion Session
This is what happens after a panic. Thursday’s AI disruption selloff was violent: Dow down 669, trucking stocks down 15-25%, Apple’s worst day since April, CBRE down 9%, all megacaps red. Friday should have been the recovery session, especially with a better-than-expected CPI report providing the fundamental catalyst. Instead, the market crawled to a flatline close. That’s exhaustion. Not selling, not buying, just staring at the screen trying to figure out what the last three weeks mean. The pattern is recognizable from prior stress episodes: the sharp selloff, the failed bounce, the flat session where volume drops and everyone processes. The question this archetype raises is whether the processing phase leads to stabilization (support holds, dip buyers emerge, software names find a floor) or whether the pause is just reloading before the next leg down. The answer usually depends on what breaks during the quiet period, and we just got handed 72 hours of silence.
💧 Flow Pulse
The session’s defining feature was the split personality of the tape. Chip equipment and EVs ripped higher: Applied Materials surged 14% on earnings that confirmed AI infrastructure demand is accelerating, and Rivian jumped 27% on delivery guidance that proved EV demand exists beyond Tesla’s orbit. Roku gained 15% on strong Q4 earnings and above-consensus 2026 guidance. These were legitimate, earnings-driven moves in companies that delivered results.
Software caught a genuine bounce after three weeks of relentless selling. Salesforce added 2.6%, ServiceNow rose 3.7% on the Pyramid Analytics acquisition, and Oracle gained 2.9%. The IGV software ETF ticked up, and analysts started publishing “oversold” calls. But this was a tactical bounce in a sector still deep in bear market territory, not a reversal. Palantir, the poster child of the software selloff, is still down 27% year-to-date.
On the losing side, DraftKings plunged 14% on its guidance miss, dragging Penn Entertainment down 5% in sympathy. The mega-cap tech complex continued to bleed: Apple fell 2.3%, Nvidia dropped 2.2%, Meta lost 1.6%, Alphabet slipped 1.1%, and Broadcom shed 1.8%. The Visa selloff (-3.1%) added fintech to the list of AI-disruption-adjacent concerns. The pattern from this week is now crystal clear: AI infrastructure builders go up, everything that AI might theoretically disrupt goes down, and the rest of the market flattens out while it figures out which camp it belongs in.
Gold crossed $5,000 and closed at $5,042, a record-adjacent level. Silver hit $77.34. The precious metals rally is significant because it’s happening alongside falling yields and a weakening dollar, suggesting genuine safe-haven demand rather than an inflation hedge. Institutional money is rotating into gold, Treasuries, consumer staples, and utilities. The “AI-proof portfolio” is starting to look like something a financial advisor from 1985 would have recommended.
Forked Feed says: Applied Materials gained 14% because it makes the machines that build the chips that power the AI that’s destroying every other stock. Rivian gained 27% because it makes trucks and trucks are physical objects that cannot be replaced by a white paper. DraftKings crashed 14% because it made money for the first time in its life but didn’t make enough promises about making more money next year. Software bounced 3% after losing 30%, which is the financial equivalent of finding a quarter in the couch after your house burned down. Apple fell another 2.3% because Siri still doesn’t work and the FTC wants to know why Apple News is apparently biased, which is a problem Apple probably wishes it had instead of the $400 billion in market cap it’s shed this year. Nvidia dropped 2.2% because the market decided that spending $700 billion on AI infrastructure might not generate returns, which is awkward because the entire bull thesis for the last two years was that it would. And gold crossed $5,000 because when the chip stocks are too expensive and the software stocks are collapsing and the trucking stocks are being attacked by karaoke companies, apparently the safest investment on Earth is a shiny metal that doesn’t run software, doesn’t need chips, and definitely cannot be disrupted by artificial intelligence. A rock. The smart money is buying a rock. Welcome to 2026.
🔮 Forked Forecast
Bull Case (30%): The three-day weekend allows the AI panic to cool and the CPI data to sink in. Tuesday opens with dip buyers targeting the most oversold software names, emboldened by Friday’s bounce in Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Oracle. Applied Materials’ guidance becomes the catalyst for a broader semiconductor rally. Rate cut expectations firm up with yields near 4.00%, creating a genuine tailwind for growth stocks that the market was too shell-shocked to price in on Friday. SPY reclaims 688 by Wednesday. The S&P retests 6,900 before month-end as the market remembers that the economy is actually fine and AI disruption is a multi-year process, not a multi-week event. Bitcoin holds $68K and pushes toward $72K. The cool CPI took the scariest near-term catalyst off the table, and three days of distance from Thursday’s panic gives institutional desks time to reassess.
Base Case (50%): Markets reopen Tuesday and trade in a tight range as the week-long Presidents’ Day-shortened calendar limits conviction. Earnings from the tail end of reporting season provide individual stock catalysts but don’t move the index. Software stabilizes near current levels but doesn’t rally. The S&P chops between 6,780 and 6,880 (SPY 678-688), waiting for a catalyst that doesn’t come until the February PCE data or March FOMC meeting. The AI disruption narrative fades from daily headlines but remains an overhang. Bitcoin trades $66-70K. Gold holds above $5,000. Yields stay 4.00-4.10%. The market doesn’t crash, doesn’t rally, just drifts while nursing its bruises.
Bear Case (20%): A geopolitical headline drops over the long weekend while equity markets are closed, and crypto takes the initial hit. Bitcoin breaks $65K. Tuesday’s open gaps down as institutional traders who trimmed risk Friday don’t reload. The CPI’s downward bias from government shutdown data gaps gets more attention, causing economists to discount the good print. The AI disruption contagion finds a new sector to attack. The S&P breaks 6,780 and tests 6,700. The VIX pushes above 23. Apple continues sliding on Siri delays and FTC scrutiny, dragging mega-cap tech lower. This scenario requires a fresh negative catalyst because the macro risk just got defused by the cool CPI, making it less likely but not impossible.
Triggers to Watch:
Tuesday’s reopen: does the market gap up (panic faded) or gap down (weekend worry)?
S&P 6,780: the January 21 low remains the critical support that separates “pullback” from “correction”
Software stabilization: can Salesforce, ServiceNow, and Oracle hold Friday’s bounce, or does the selling resume?
Mega-cap tech: Apple, Nvidia, and Meta led the selling this week. Their direction next week sets the tone for the entire index
Weekend headlines: crypto markets open while equities are closed, making Bitcoin the early warning system for any risk-off developments
📖 Available Now!
Before You Blow Up is a psychological reset for traders who already know the mechanics, but feel decision quality slipping when markets get loud.
This isn’t about new strategies, indicators, or setups. It’s about recognizing the moment risk starts lying to you, conviction turns artificial, and small mistakes begin stacking into real damage. Most traders don’t fail all at once. They drift, tilt, overtrade, and slowly bleed confidence away. This book exists to interrupt that process early.
Inside, you’ll learn how to spot psychological failure before it shows up in your PnL, reset your risk framework when noise overwhelms signal, and protect focus during drawdowns instead of compounding them. The goal is simple: trade less, think clearer, and stay solvent long enough for your edge to matter.
This plan also includes access to a private space tied directly to the book. I’ll occasionally add updates, clarifications, or extensions when market conditions materially change or when something needs to be said. No schedule. No noise. Only signal.
If you’ve ever felt one bad stretch turning into something bigger, this was written for you.
💬 Final Thought
The market got its CPI tiebreaker. And it chose not to play.
January inflation came in at 2.4%, the lowest since May 2025, with shelter costs finally decelerating and energy prices falling. The data validated the rate cut thesis, confirmed that tariff-driven inflation is fading, and gave the Fed exactly the cover it needs to cut in June. Six months ago, this print would have sent the S&P to new highs. Today, it barely moved the needle. The index closed up three points, lost 1.5% for the week, and headed into a three-day weekend trapped below 7,000 for the sixth consecutive week.
The problem isn’t the economy. The economy is fine. Jobs are being created, inflation is cooling, consumers are spending, and earnings growth is running at 13% for the S&P 500. The problem is that the market has developed a new primary fear that rate cuts can’t fix and CPI prints can’t address: the fear that artificial intelligence is about to render entire industries obsolete. Software lost a trillion. Trucking lost billions on a white paper. Real estate fell because AI might reduce headcount. Fintech is under pressure. Ad tech is collapsing. And the contagion is moving faster than the technology itself.
Applied Materials proved today that the AI buildout is real, accelerating, and generating record demand. Rivian proved that companies making physical products for physical humans can still have great days. But the market’s attention span is shorter than Siri’s, and the next AI disruption headline is always one tweet away from crashing whatever sector hasn’t been hit yet.
Three-day weekends are supposed to be relaxing. This one comes with the market down for the week, the Dow back below 50,000, software in a bear market, and gold above $5,000 because investors have decided the safest asset on Earth is one that was discovered 6,000 years ago.
Happy Presidents’ Day. Don’t check your portfolio.
Issue 7 - Narratives Lag Ownership
Narratives do not move markets.
Let me repeat that… narratives do not move markets.
They follow them.
That is uncomfortable for people who want explanations, because narratives feel like control. They offer cause and effect, heroes and villains, reasons why price did what it did. The problem is that by the time a narrative feels convincing, the important decisions have already been made.
Ownership changes first.
Stories come later.
Markets move when positioning shifts, when tolerance breaks, and when conviction quietly changes hands. Narratives arrive afterward to make that movement feel reasonable in hindsight. They do not lead behavior. They rationalize it.
Bitcoin makes this lag especially obvious.
When price is rising and ownership is concentrating, narratives turn optimistic. When price is falling and ownership is transferring, narratives turn hostile. In both cases, the story adjusts to fit what already happened. The confidence people place in those stories comes from timing, not accuracy.
This is why narratives feel smartest near peaks and bottoms.
Near peaks, optimism sounds informed because price has been rewarding it. Near bottoms, pessimism sounds rational because pain has accumulated. In both cases, the narrative feels obvious precisely because it is late.
Social mood is the bridge between ownership and narrative.
Quick explanation of social mood…
Social mood is the invisible current beneath price.
It is the collective tone of confidence or contraction that shapes how people interpret the same information differently at different times. It determines whether news is dismissed or amplified, whether risk feels attractive or threatening, and whether uncertainty is tolerated or avoided. Price does not create social mood. It reflects it.
When social mood expands, participation grows, narratives feel convincing, and risk appears manageable. When it contracts, hesitation increases, explanations multiply, and tolerance shrinks. The headlines change, but the underlying shift happens first.
Social mood is not opinion.
It is behavior before explanation.
As confidence expands, people search for reasons to justify staying involved. As confidence contracts, they search for reasons to justify leaving. The story changes, but the behavior underneath remains the same. People are responding to discomfort or comfort first and explaining it second.
This is where many participants get trapped.
They wait for the right narrative before acting, not realizing that narratives are a record of action, not a signal for it. By the time the story feels safe enough to believe, the opportunity that required discomfort has already passed.
Bitcoin does not reward narrative alignment.
It rewards behavioral alignment.
Those who accumulate quietly during periods of uncertainty rarely have a compelling story to tell at the time. Those who arrive later usually have excellent explanations and worse positioning.
Threshold Theory treats narratives as background noise.
The important information is not what people are saying. It is what they are doing. Ownership shifts tell you more than headlines ever will. Price compressions, failed follow-through, and long quiet periods often matter more than the story built around them.
Bitcoin ownership changes hands when narratives feel least useful.
That is not accidental. It is the mechanism.
Social Mood Read
People are searching for explanations after behavior has already shifted. When this mood dominates, narratives multiply while clarity decreases. The increase in storytelling is often a sign that conviction has already moved on.
Mood Signal
Stories rising faster than participation.
When Bitcoin stalls, the loudest people get busier. Threads get longer. Explanations get sharper. Confidence gets theatrical. Meanwhile real participation slows and positioning thins out. Talking replaces taking risks. People mistake narrative fluency for market alignment. By the time the story feels undeniable, the transfer has already happened. Bitcoin does not reward those who explain it best. It rewards those who move before the explanation feels safe.
What to Watch This Week
Notice when explanations feel satisfying. That is often when they are least useful. Ask whether ownership is changing quietly while attention is focused on stories. Markets do not wait for consensus. They move while people are still explaining the last move.
Bitcoin does not need a story to work.
It needs time and behavior.
And narratives will always arrive late to explain both.
That’s all for issue #178. CPI came in cool at 2.4% and the market moved three points. Applied Materials surged 14% because AI needs machines and the machines need machines and those machines are printing money. Rivian jumped 27% because electric trucks exist in the physical world where white papers can’t hurt you. DraftKings crashed 14% on its first profitable year because it didn’t promise enough about next year. Software bounced 3% off a 30% decline. Apple fell another 2.3% because Siri is still being tested twenty months after it was announced. Nvidia dropped 2.2% because the market decided $700 billion in AI spending might not generate returns. And gold crossed $5,000 because when everything with a ticker symbol is being evaluated for AI disruption risk, the smartest trade is apparently a mineral that humans have valued since before they invented the wheel.
The wheel, for what it’s worth, has not yet been disrupted by artificial intelligence. Give it a week.
-- Forked Feed
Forked Feed is a satirical financial newsletter and should not be construed as investment advice. We're just here to point out the absurdity. Past performance of our snark does not guarantee future sarcasm.
🔗 Stay Connected
Twitter: @txwestcapital
Twitter: @theforkedfeed
YouTube: TexasWestCapital
Website: TheForkedFeed.com and ForkedFeed.ai (coming soon)