A Substack Post Moved More Money Than the Supreme Court, IBM Had Its Worst Day Since 2000, and Trump Maxed Out His Tariffs – Market Breakdown #184
S&P fell 1% to 6,837, erasing Friday's rally and going negative YTD. IBM crashed 13% on Anthropic's COBOL tool. Novo lost $100B on a failed trial. A fictional AI doom report tanked DoorDash and Visa.
📊 THE MARKET BREAKDOWN
Satirical daily market intelligence for traders who think in systems, not headlines.
Issue #184 | February 23, 2026
🔥 Headlines & Hysteria (powered by Forked Feed)
A Little-Known Substack Called Citrini Research Published a Fictional Scenario About AI Destroying the Economy by 2028, Explicitly Labeled It “Not a Prediction,” and the Market Lost Hundreds of Billions of Dollars in Real Market Cap on Monday Because Apparently Wall Street Now Trades Fanfiction
Forked Feed says: On Sunday, a research outfit called Citrini Research, founded by a former paramedic turned medical marijuana dispensary co-founder turned financial analyst, published “The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis,” a hypothetical scenario imagining what happens if AI agents make white-collar workers obsolete and consumer spending collapses. The report explicitly opens with the disclaimer that it is “a scenario, not a prediction” and that it is neither “bear porn” nor “AI doomer fan-fiction.” The market read this disclaimer, nodded thoughtfully, and then panic-sold every single company mentioned in the report. DoorDash fell 6.6%. American Express cratered 7.2%. KKR and Blackstone dropped 8%. Visa, Mastercard, Uber, Capital One, and Apollo all fell 3-5%. ServiceNow and other enterprise software names got shredded. The fictional scenario imagines June 2028 with 10.2% unemployment, a 38% S&P drawdown, and something called “Ghost GDP” where machines produce output that doesn’t translate into wages. It envisions AI agents comparison-shopping DoorDash out of existence and eliminating the transaction fees that fund Visa and Mastercard’s entire business model. DoorDash’s co-founder Andy Fang responded on X by saying “the ground is shifting underneath our feet, and the industry is going to need to adapt to it,” which is what you say when a work of speculative fiction just wiped 7% off your stock and you don’t want to sound dismissive. Jonestrading’s chief market strategist Michael O’Rourke said what everyone was thinking: “I have seen this market exhibit incredible resilience in the face of actual negative news. Now a literal work of fiction sends it into a tailspin.” TheStreet’s Rev Shark called it “irrational panic,” the mirror image of 2000’s irrational exuberance, noting that investors are “selling real businesses with real earnings into the ground” over hypothetical scenarios. The market is now so spooked by AI disruption that a Substack post with a creative writing exercise can move more capital in a single session than a Supreme Court ruling did on Friday. The AI scare trade has graduated from “sell first, ask questions later” to “sell first, don’t even read the disclaimer.”Forked Feed says: Anthropic announced Monday that its Claude Code tool can automate the exploration and analysis work that makes COBOL modernization so expensive. COBOL, for those blissfully unaware, is a programming language from 1959 that still processes an estimated 95% of all ATM transactions in the United States. Hundreds of billions of lines of it run in production every single day, powering banks, airlines, and government systems. The number of people who understand COBOL shrinks every year because, shockingly, computer science graduates in 2026 are not lining up to learn a language older than the Space Race. IBM has built its entire mainframe empire around the fact that COBOL is too expensive and too complex to modernize without armies of consultants billing by the hour for years. Anthropic just said Claude Code can do that work in quarters instead of years. IBM’s stock fell 13%, its worst day since October 2000. That’s a dot-com-era plunge. The stock is now down 27% in February alone, on track for its worst month since at least 1968, which is the year the Apollo program was in full swing, IBM was dominating the mainframe industry, and COBOL was already nine years old and running the world. Accenture fell 6.6%. Cognizant fell 6%. These are companies whose consulting practices generate billions from COBOL modernization projects that take years and cost fortunes. Anthropic’s blog post said “legacy code modernization stalled for years because understanding legacy code cost more than rewriting it. AI flips that equation.” IBM’s CEO Arvind Krishna reported the company’s highest mainframe revenue in 20 years just last month. The Register pointed out that IBM has been touting its own AI code conversion tools since 2013. But the market doesn’t care about nuance. The market saw “Anthropic” and “COBOL” in the same sentence and decided that a company that reported record mainframe revenue four weeks ago is now existentially threatened. This is the fourth consecutive trading day where Anthropic has crashed an entire sector. Friday it was cybersecurity (CrowdStrike -8%, Cloudflare -8%). Monday it’s legacy IT consulting. At this rate, Anthropic will have disrupted every software vertical in the S&P 500 by the end of the week, and they haven’t even shipped a product. They’ve shipped blog posts.
Forked Feed says: On Friday, Trump signed a 10% global tariff under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 in response to the Supreme Court striking down his IEEPA tariffs. On Saturday, he raised it to 15%, the maximum allowed under the statute, effective at 12:01 AM on February 24. The tariffs have never been used before under Section 122, they expire in 150 days unless Congress extends them, they include exemptions for critical minerals, metals, and energy products, and CUSMA-compliant goods from Canada and Mexico are exempt. Trump said he had “no plans to consult Congress,” said countries that “play games” with existing trade deals would face “even higher levies,” and described the Supreme Court decision as “ridiculous, poorly written, and extraordinarily anti-American.” The EU responded by saying the current situation is “not conducive to delivering fair, balanced, and mutually beneficial transatlantic trade.” India suspended trade agreement discussions with the U.S. France’s trade minister said the EU should take a “united approach” to the tariffs. Bessent said he expects Section 232 and 301 tariffs to “rise up” and the Section 122 tariffs could “disappear after five months.” So the 150-day tariff is a bridge to even more tariffs under different statutes. The effective tariff rate is now approximately 13% across all imports. The market, which rallied 0.69% on Friday because tariffs were supposedly dying, fell 1% on Monday because tariffs are very much alive and 50% larger than what was signed 48 hours ago. Friday’s 6,900 breakout lasted exactly one trading session. The S&P closed at 6,837, below where it opened Friday morning before the Supreme Court ruling even came out. The entire tariff-relief rally has been erased and then some. The whack-a-mole analogy from Friday’s newsletter wasn’t a joke. It was a preview.
Forked Feed says: Novo Nordisk announced the REDEFINE 4 Phase 3 trial results Monday morning. CagriSema, the drug that Novo positioned as its “Lilly-killer” and the cornerstone of its competitive comeback, failed to demonstrate non-inferiority against Eli Lilly’s tirzepatide (sold as Zepbound). Patients on CagriSema lost 20.2% of their body weight after 84 weeks. Patients on tirzepatide lost 23.6%. That 3.4 percentage point gap doesn’t sound like much until you realize it translated into a 15% stock crash that wiped roughly $100 billion off Novo’s market cap in a single session, hitting levels not seen since June 2021. Novo’s stock is now down about 49% from its 2025 highs, down 27% in February, and down 7% year-to-date. Morgan Stanley called the results a “worst-case scenario.” An analyst called the drug “obsolete.” CEO Maziar Mike Doustdar pushed back, noting CagriSema has already been submitted to the FDA and could still be the first GLP-1/amylin combo product to market. But in the obesity drug market, “first to market but clinically inferior” is not a winning pitch when your competitor’s drug already works better and is already available. Eli Lilly rose 3% on the news because in pharma, your competitor’s clinical failure is your stock’s best catalyst. Novo now trades at 13x forward earnings with a 4% dividend yield, which is either deep value or a falling knife depending on whether you believe the obesity duopoly is still intact or whether Eli Lilly just became a monopoly. The obesity market has officially entered the “winner take all” phase.
Forked Feed says: The Dow fell 822 points (1.66%) to 48,804. The S&P lost 1.04% to close at 6,837. The Nasdaq dropped 1.1% to 22,627. The S&P is now negative for the year. Friday’s 6,900 breakout lasted one session. It is dead. The Dow’s 822-point loss was driven primarily by IBM’s 13% crash, which alone subtracted roughly 150 points from the 30-stock index. The software ETF fell 4.8%, and a major software ETF is now down 27% in 2026, on track for its biggest quarterly drop since the 2008 financial crisis. The AI scare trade claimed new victims in payments (Visa, Mastercard, AmEx), delivery (DoorDash, Uber), consulting (Accenture, Cognizant), alternative assets (KKR, Blackstone, Apollo), and legacy IT (IBM). Gilead announced a $7.8 billion acquisition of Arcellx, sending the biotech up 80%. Domino’s beat revenue expectations. Nvidia was roughly flat because absolutely nobody is going to sell Nvidia two days before it reports the most anticipated earnings print of the quarter. Gold climbed past $5,168. Bitcoin broke below $65,000, continuing its 2026 slide. The VIX rose to 21. The S&P is now caught in the tightest range in 60 years, according to Bespoke Investment Group, and the 50-day moving average is almost dead flat. The equal-weight S&P is up 6.4% this year while the Magnificent 7 is down 5%. That breadth divergence is historically rare and historically unresolvable: either the equal-weight comes down or the Mag 7 catches up. Nvidia earnings on Wednesday will determine which.
🔎 Today’s Focus: The AI Scare Trade Goes Mainstream
Friday was about tariffs and the Supreme Court. Monday was about something more fundamental: the market is now genuinely terrified that AI will destroy established business models faster than anyone priced in.
The mechanism was a one-two punch. First, Citrini Research’s “The 2028 Global Intelligence Crisis” went viral over the weekend, a fictional scenario exploring what happens when AI agents eliminate white-collar jobs, collapse consumer spending, and hollow out payment processors, delivery platforms, and enterprise software. The report was explicitly labeled a thought experiment. It was published on Substack. It was written by a guy who started as a paramedic. And it tanked DoorDash 6.6%, American Express 7.2%, and dragged Visa, Mastercard, KKR, Blackstone, Uber, and Apollo down 3-8%.
Then Anthropic landed the second punch. After destroying cybersecurity stocks on Friday with Claude Code Security, it published a blog post Monday morning about Claude Code’s ability to modernize COBOL codebases, which struck directly at IBM’s mainframe business and the consulting firms (Accenture, Cognizant) that bill billions for legacy modernization work. IBM fell 13%, its worst day in 25 years. The combined damage: a software ETF is down 27% year-to-date, on track for its worst quarter since 2008.
Here’s what makes this different from the DeepSeek scare in January 2025: DeepSeek threatened the AI builders. This threatens the AI beneficiaries, the legacy companies, and the broader economy simultaneously. When a Substack thought experiment can move more capital than actual earnings reports, it tells you that the market has no framework for pricing AI disruption and is defaulting to “sell everything that could conceivably be affected.” That’s every company. IBM, Visa, DoorDash, Blackstone, and CrowdStrike have nothing in common except that a research note or a blog post mentioned their names in the context of AI disruption. The market is pricing AI like it’s a contagion, not a technology.
The irony is thick. The S&P rallied on Friday because the Supreme Court struck down tariffs, which was supposed to be the big overhang. Monday’s sell-off had nothing to do with tariffs. It was about AI eating consulting, payments, delivery, cybersecurity, and enterprise software. Tariffs are a policy risk that can be negotiated, litigated, or repealed. AI disruption is a structural risk that compounds. The market just told you which one it’s more afraid of.
Nvidia reports Wednesday. If Nvidia beats and guides up, it validates the AI buildout narrative and potentially provides air cover for the entire market. If Nvidia misses or guides conservatively, the scare trade intensifies because the builders would be struggling at the same time the legacy companies are being destroyed. Wednesday is the most important earnings print of 2026 so far.
Forked Feed says: What’s happening is a phase transition in how the market thinks about AI. Phase 1 was “AI is good for the companies that build it” (Nvidia, Microsoft, Alphabet). Phase 2 was “AI is bad for the companies it replaces” (software, cybersecurity). Phase 3, which started today, is “AI might be bad for everything.” The Citrini report imagines a world where AI agents eliminate transaction fees, comparison-shop delivery platforms into irrelevance, and cause mass white-collar unemployment. It’s fiction. But the market is trading it as a probability-weighted scenario because nobody can confidently say it won’t happen.
⚡ The Setup
SPY 682.39 | BTC 63,724.75 | US10Y 4.046 | DXY 97.787
SPY closed at 682.39, putting the S&P at 6,837. Friday’s 6,900 breakout lasted exactly one session. The level that the market spent seven weeks trying to clear was given up in under 24 hours, which is about as definitive a failed breakout as you’ll find in a technical analysis textbook. The S&P is now back in the range it’s been trapped in all year and has turned negative year-to-date. The 50-day moving average is dead flat, which Bespoke Investment Group noted is the tightest range for the S&P this late in February in 60 years. Support sits at 6,800, then 6,770 (the February low). If 6,800 breaks, the next stop is the 200-day moving average. Resistance is the now-reclaimed 6,900 level, which just transformed from a ceiling into a fortress. The VIX rose to 21, indicating the options market is repricing risk higher but not at panic levels yet. Nvidia earnings on Wednesday are the binary catalyst: either the S&P finds a floor on a Nvidia beat or the AI scare trade accelerates on a miss.
BTC traded at $63,724.75, breaking decisively below the $65,000 support level that we flagged as critical in the last two issues. Bitcoin is now down 49.5% from its October ATH of $126,210. The breakdown below $65,000 is significant because it was the floor of the range that held through most of February. Hedge funds that helped fuel the bitcoin ETF boom have been retreating, according to new data cited by Yahoo Finance. The combination of 15% tariffs, AI-driven market panic, and the strongest dollar in weeks is a triple headwind for crypto. Bitcoin dominance at 58.44% suggests altcoins are bleeding faster. ETH at $1,830 is at multi-month lows. Total crypto market cap dropped to $684.83 billion. The next major support for BTC is $60,000, then $57,000. A bounce requires either Nvidia earnings to lift risk appetite broadly or a dovish signal from the Fed, neither of which is likely this week.
The 10-year yield fell to 4.046%, its lowest close in over a week, as the bond market absorbed Monday’s risk-off mood. The flight to safety pushed yields lower despite the inflationary implications of Trump’s 15% tariff (higher tariffs mean higher import costs mean stickier inflation). The bond market is currently more afraid of an AI-driven growth shock than it is of tariff-driven inflation, which is a notable shift. The March FOMC meeting (March 18-19) is a non-event at 94% hold probability. Fed Governor Waller said Monday that if labor market data remain strong and inflation persists, it “may be appropriate to hold the FOMC’s policy rate at current levels.” The bond market is now pricing no cuts until mid-2026 at the earliest, and the hot core PCE print from Friday (3.0%) keeps the “rate hike” whispers alive.
DXY held at 97.787, essentially flat despite the risk-off session. The dollar is caught between competing forces: the 15% tariff is bullish for the dollar (tariffs reduce imports, strengthening the current account), but the fiscal uncertainty from the IEEPA revenue loss is bearish (deficit widens, creditworthiness questioned). The EU and India both pushed back on the new tariffs, with the EU warning of retaliatory measures and India suspending trade talks. Gold surged past $5,168, extending its run as the ultimate safe-haven asset in a market where tariffs, AI disruption, stagflation data, and geopolitical risk are all converging simultaneously. Silver pushed toward $88. Gold analysts are now targeting $7,000-$10,000 based on fiscal deterioration and geopolitical risk. The dollar-gold dynamic continues to diverge from its traditional inverse relationship as both assets find demand for different reasons: the dollar for yield differential and gold for existential hedging.
🏛 Market Archetype: The Fear Cascade
Friday’s Plot Twist resolved in the worst possible way. The new narrative (tariff relief) collapsed in one session as Trump maxed out Section 122 at 15%, and the old narrative (AI disruption) metastasized from cybersecurity into consulting, payments, delivery, and alternative assets all at once. This is The Fear Cascade: a market where multiple unrelated sell signals (tariff escalation, AI disruption report, drug trial failure, legacy tech collapse) converge on the same day and create a self-reinforcing wave of de-risking. Fear Cascades don’t require a single catalyst to be correct. They require the collective weight of uncertainty to exceed the market’s tolerance for holding risk. That threshold was crossed on Monday. The S&P went from breaking out above 6,900 on Friday to turning negative for the year on Monday. That’s a two-session swing from bullish breakout to bear territory. Fear Cascades resolve one of two ways: either a strong catalyst (Nvidia earnings) absorbs the fear and reverses the cascade, or the fear feeds on itself and the market tests lower supports. The next 48 hours determine which.
💧 Flow Pulse
The AI scare trade dominated every flow on Monday. The sell-off was indiscriminate across any company that could conceivably be disrupted by AI, which turns out to be almost everything.
Legacy tech and consulting: IBM crashed 13% ($31 billion in market cap erased), Accenture fell 6.6%, and Cognizant dropped 6%. These are companies whose revenue is tied to COBOL modernization and legacy system consulting, both now under direct threat from Anthropic’s Claude Code. IBM is down 27% in February, its worst monthly performance since 1968.
Payments and delivery: DoorDash fell 6.6%, AmEx crashed 7.2%, Visa and Mastercard each dropped 4%+, Uber fell 4%+. These stocks were targeted by name in the Citrini report, which imagined AI agents eliminating the transaction fees and habitual app loyalty that these companies profit from.
Alternative assets and financials: KKR and Blackstone dropped 8%+, Apollo fell 4%+, Capital One dropped 4%+. The Citrini report specifically flagged private credit exposure to software-backed loans and PE-backed deals as vulnerable in an AI disruption scenario, which is pouring salt on the Blue Owl private credit wound from last week.
Software: The software ETF fell 4.8% and is now down 27% year-to-date, on track for its worst quarter since the 2008 financial crisis. Microsoft, CrowdStrike, and cybersecurity names that were hit on Friday continued bleeding on Monday.
Pharma: Novo Nordisk cratered 15%, wiping roughly $100 billion in market cap on the CagriSema trial failure. Eli Lilly rose 3%. Gilead acquired Arcellx for $7.8 billion, sending ACLX up 80%.
Safe havens: Gold surged past $5,168. Silver pushed toward $88. Bonds rallied (10-year yield fell to 4.046%). Bitcoin broke below $65,000, proving once again that crypto is not a safe haven, it’s a risk asset that sells off harder than equities when fear spikes.
Forked Feed says: If you want to understand what happened today in one image, picture a market where IBM, DoorDash, Visa, Blackstone, and Novo Nordisk all fell 6-15% for five completely different reasons (blog post about COBOL, fictional Substack report, tariff escalation, drug trial failure, cybersecurity fears), while Nvidia sat flat because nobody dares sell it before Wednesday. That’s not a market correction. That’s a market having a simultaneous panic attack about six different things while holding perfectly still on the one stock that matters most. The S&P fell 1% and Nvidia was flat. The software ETF fell 4.8% and the equal-weight S&P is up 6.4% for the year. Nothing is correlated except the direction of the fear.
🔮 Forked Forecast
Bull Case (15%): Nvidia earnings on Wednesday blow out expectations, with Jensen Huang confirming Blackwell demand is “off the charts” and raising guidance. The beat is strong enough to offset the AI scare trade by validating the capex cycle and restoring confidence in tech broadly. Goldman’s $200 price target and Wells Fargo’s $220 target look prescient. The Section 122 tariff is seen as weaker and more limited than IEEPA (150-day cap, exemptions for key products). The S&P reclaims 6,870 and uses Nvidia as a springboard back toward 6,900. Gold holds above $5,100 as structural demand persists.
Base Case (45%): The market chops between 6,800 and 6,870 ahead of Nvidia earnings Wednesday, with Tuesday’s Consumer Confidence data and Trump’s State of the Union address adding noise but not direction. Nvidia beats modestly but guidance is in line, stabilizing tech without reigniting a rally. The AI scare trade continues to pressure software, payments, and consulting stocks as analysts publish follow-up notes to the Citrini report. The S&P stays in its year-long range, now defined by 6,800 support and 6,900 resistance. Bitcoin tests $62,000-$64,000. Gold holds $5,100-$5,200. The 10-year yield oscillates around 4.0-4.1%.
Bear Case (40%): The AI scare trade intensifies through Tuesday and Wednesday as more analysts pile on to the disruption narrative. Nvidia reports Wednesday but guidance disappoints or merely meets expectations, failing to provide the circuit breaker the market needs. The S&P breaks below 6,800, triggering a test of the 6,770 February low. The 15% tariff takes effect Tuesday morning and the market immediately prices in further escalation under Section 301 and 232. EU retaliatory measures materialize. Bitcoin breaks $60,000. The software ETF’s 27% YTD loss deepens toward 30%+. Private credit stress resurfaces as the Citrini report’s fictional PE-backed software loan defaults become a real-world worry. The market enters a genuine correction phase.
Triggers to Watch:
Nvidia earnings (Wednesday February 25): The single most important catalyst of the quarter. Goldman PT $200, Wells Fargo PT $220. A beat stabilizes everything. A miss accelerates the fear cascade. Jensen Huang said Blackwell demand is “off the charts.” The market needs him to prove it.
Section 122 tariffs take effect (Tuesday February 24 at 12:01 AM): The 15% global tariff becomes real. Watch for immediate legal challenges and corporate reactions.
Consumer Confidence (Tuesday): Expected to rise to 87.5. A miss would confirm the stagflation narrative from Friday’s GDP/PCE data.
Trump State of the Union address (Tuesday evening): Trade policy details expected. Any escalation rhetoric sends futures lower.
AI scare trade follow-through: Watch the software ETF, IBM, and payment stocks for continued selling. If the Citrini-driven selloff extends into Tuesday, it signals the fear cascade is self-sustaining.
Bitcoin $60,000 support: BTC broke below $65,000 for the first time. If $60,000 fails, crypto enters a new downleg that could spill into risk sentiment broadly.
IEEPA tariff refund litigation: Legal proceedings on the $160B+ refund question continue. Any court orders on refund timelines would move importers and retailers.
📖 Available Now!
Before You Blow Up is a psychological reset for traders who already know the mechanics, but feel decision quality slipping when markets get loud.
This isn’t about new strategies, indicators, or setups. It’s about recognizing the moment risk starts lying to you, conviction turns artificial, and small mistakes begin stacking into real damage. Most traders don’t fail all at once. They drift, tilt, overtrade, and slowly bleed confidence away. This book exists to interrupt that process early.
Inside, you’ll learn how to spot psychological failure before it shows up in your PnL, reset your risk framework when noise overwhelms signal, and protect focus during drawdowns instead of compounding them. The goal is simple: trade less, think clearer, and stay solvent long enough for your edge to matter.
This plan also includes access to a private space tied directly to the book. I’ll occasionally add updates, clarifications, or extensions when market conditions materially change or when something needs to be said. No schedule. No noise. Only signal.
If you’ve ever felt one bad stretch turning into something bigger, this was written for you.
💬 Final Thought
Today the market discovered something it really didn’t want to know: the AI disruption threat is bigger than the tariff threat.
On Friday, the S&P surged to 6,909 because the Supreme Court struck down IEEPA tariffs. The move was framed as liberation, the removal of the biggest policy overhang since April 2025. For 90 glorious minutes, it felt like the market had been set free.
Then Trump signed a replacement tariff. Then he raised it to 15% over the weekend. Then the market opened Monday and fell 1%, not because of tariffs, but because a Substack post and a blog about COBOL convinced investors that AI is going to dismantle the global economy from the inside out.
The damage inventory: IBM, a 114-year-old company that just reported record mainframe revenue, lost $31 billion in market cap because of a blog post. DoorDash, Visa, Mastercard, American Express, KKR, and Blackstone all fell 4-8% because of a fictional scenario about 2028 unemployment. Novo Nordisk lost $100 billion because a drug trial missed by 3.4 percentage points. The S&P turned negative for the year.
And Nvidia was flat.
That’s the summary of the market in late February 2026. Everything is getting destroyed except the one company that everyone is counting on to justify the AI revolution. The entire S&P is holding its breath for Wednesday at 4 PM when Jensen Huang either validates or invalidates the narrative that has been simultaneously building and destroying trillions of dollars in market cap.
Here’s what’s genuinely new about today: the AI scare trade has jumped the containment line. It started in software. Then it hit cybersecurity. Then consulting. Now it’s in payments, delivery, alternative assets, and legacy IT. The Citrini report imagined it reaching mortgages, employment, and consumer spending by 2028. If the pattern of the last three weeks continues, the market will price that scenario by March.
The AI companies are publishing blog posts and the rest of the market is catching fire. That’s not a temporary dislocation. That’s a structural repricing of what intelligence is worth in a world where it’s becoming abundant. The question isn’t whether AI will disrupt these industries. It’s whether the market is pricing the disruption rationally or whether it’s panicking the way it panicked about internet stocks in 2000, just in the opposite direction.
Nvidia on Wednesday. That’s the only thing that matters.
-- Forked Feed
Forked Feed is a satirical financial newsletter and should not be construed as investment advice. We're just here to point out the absurdity. Past performance of our snark does not guarantee future sarcasm.
🔗 Stay Connected
Twitter: @txwestcapital
Twitter: @theforkedfeed
YouTube: TexasWestCapital
Website: TheForkedFeed.com and ForkedFeed.ai (coming soon)